Review of: Ulrike Busch, Daphne Hahn (Hg.): Abtreibung. Diskurse und Tendenzen. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag 2015.

Authors

  • Johanna Özogul Masterstudentin „Sexualwissenschaft - Bildung und Beratung im Kontext von Sexualität, Partnerschaft und Familienplanung" an der Hochschule Merseburg, Honorarkraft bei pro familia und studentische Hilfskraft in der Genderforschung.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14766/1167

Keywords:

Alte Frauenbewegungen, Behinderung, Bevölkerungspolitik, Ethik, Familie, Feminismus, Mutterschaft, Neue Frauenbewegungen, Partnerschaft, Religion, Schwangerschaftsabbruch, Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Gender, Geschlecht

Abstract

The interdisciplinary anthology offers a multifaceted discussion of pregnancy terminations, with a focus on the situation in the German-language countries. Using research methods primarily from the social sciences, the articles analyze the topic’s historical, societal, legal, and ethical dimensions. Moral political and religious influences, the construction and interpretation of abortions, developments in reproductive medicine, the situation of professionals in the field, and the medical perspective on the question of abortion are also addressed. The articles consequently offer successful and comprehensive insights into the debate’s current areas of conflict and highlight the pertinence of a new and objective discussion of the old topic of abortion.
“Passerelle Simone de Beauvoir” by Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Downloads

Published

2015-06-15

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Rezensionen

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Johanna Özogul

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Authors retain the copyright of their texts. There is no exclusive copyright transfer to querelles-net.

 From 2009 on, articles at querelles-net have been published under the terms of a CC BY license:

from 2009-2015 the license Creative Commons Attribution 3.0; from 2016 the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. These licenses allow users to freely use the texts published here, if the author and place of first publication are given. The uses covered by this license do not require separate consent on the part of the authors.

For texts published before 2009, usually no Creative Commons license was given. These texts are freely available, but further uses need to be permitted by the authors.

 We encourage our authors to publish their texts in other places as well, e.g. repositories.