Contrary to Skepticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14766/323Keywords:
Feminismus, Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Wissenschaftstheorie, Geschlecht, GenderAbstract
Feminist scientific criticism has been suffering for some time under a problematic turn to cognitive theory; such is Sharyn Clough’s diagnosis. The criticism thereby falls short of its actual task: the critique of scientific praxis. In addition, the concentration on questions of cognitive theory makes global skepticism the order of the day, which disastrously affects the believability of feminist cognitive claims. This problem is to be tackled with an anti-representational approach.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Kathrin HönigAuthors retain the copyright of their texts. There is no exclusive copyright transfer to querelles-net.
From 2009 on, articles at querelles-net have been published under the terms of a CC BY license:
from 2009-2015 the license Creative Commons Attribution 3.0; from 2016 the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. These licenses allow users to freely use the texts published here, if the author and place of first publication are given. The uses covered by this license do not require separate consent on the part of the authors.
For texts published before 2009, usually no Creative Commons license was given. These texts are freely available, but further uses need to be permitted by the authors.We encourage our authors to publish their texts in other places as well, e.g. repositories.