An(other) Attempt at Getting at the Core of Modern Structures of Inequality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14766/80Keywords:
DDR, Soziale Ungleichheit, Soziokultureller Wandel, Geschlecht, GenderAbstract
Schäfgen views the interlocking of two systems of inequality-that of ‘traditional’ social inequality and that of gender inequality-as one reason why East German women have been driven out of the labour market since the introduction of a free market economy. Starting from core assumptions about the development of modern structures of inequality, Schäfgen compares the development of social structures and gender relations in the FRG and GDR. Schäfgen merely presumes the two German states to be modern states; unfortunately, she does not explain why she views them as such. This omission does not remain without consequences. Schäfgen’s empirical findings do point to the existence of ‘classical’ gender-related inequalities in the two German states. However, her comparisons do not acknowledge any diffrences in the modes of modernity in the FRG and the GDR. In order to be able to integrate the concept of ‘double inequality’ into her analysis Schäfgen uses the model of ‘double verticality.’ The core of this model depicts the inequalities produced by gender in a vertical arrangement. WhetherSchäfgen’s model is theoretically and methodologically useful remains questionable: Is the essentialist use of concepts like ‘class’ and ‘gender’ truly able to explain the processual creation and reproduction of social inequality?Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2001 Irene DöllingAuthors retain the copyright of their texts. There is no exclusive copyright transfer to querelles-net.
From 2009 on, articles at querelles-net have been published under the terms of a CC BY license:
from 2009-2015 the license Creative Commons Attribution 3.0; from 2016 the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. These licenses allow users to freely use the texts published here, if the author and place of first publication are given. The uses covered by this license do not require separate consent on the part of the authors.
For texts published before 2009, usually no Creative Commons license was given. These texts are freely available, but further uses need to be permitted by the authors.We encourage our authors to publish their texts in other places as well, e.g. repositories.