Poietik der Ambivalenz. Zur Sinngenerierung in Tizians ‚Vergewaltigung der Lucretia‘ (1571)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14766/901Keywords:
Bildende Kunst, Gewalt, Geschlecht, GenderAbstract
The article analyzes the aesthetic structure of Titian’s Rape of Lucretia, a late painting of the year 1517, that was done for Philip II. Contrary to the painting tradition, this work does not show Lucretia’s suicide, but Tarquinius’s preceding act of violence. The incident is presented ambivalently: motivicly, Titian emphasizes the vehemence of the attack, however, on the aesthetic level and regarding the illustration of the act and its surroundings, he also refers back to images and interpretations that want to blame part of the crime on the woman. This ambivalence highly challenges the observer’s contribution to the creation of meaning, above all their image perception, so it aims at an imaginary image memory that all observers have at their command and which they access for the interpretation of real images.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Karin Gludovatz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain the copyright of their texts. There is no exclusive copyright transfer to querelles-net.
From 2009 on, articles at querelles-net have been published under the terms of a CC BY license:
from 2009-2015 the license Creative Commons Attribution 3.0; from 2016 the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. These licenses allow users to freely use the texts published here, if the author and place of first publication are given. The uses covered by this license do not require separate consent on the part of the authors.
For texts published before 2009, usually no Creative Commons license was given. These texts are freely available, but further uses need to be permitted by the authors.We encourage our authors to publish their texts in other places as well, e.g. repositories.