Review of: Regine Gildemeister, Katja Hericks: Geschlechtersoziologie. Theoretische Zugänge zu einer vertrackten Kategorie des Sozialen. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 2012.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14766/1067Keywords:
Moderne, Ungleichheit, Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Wissenschaftstheorie, Geschlecht, GenderAbstract
For the first time in the German-speaking world, Regine Gildemeister and Katja Herricks’ textbook offers a regulatory overview on the manners of thematization as well as concepts of gender in sociological theories. In doing so, the authors advocate the hypothesis that it is the task of sociology of gender to reflect about gender as an object, instead of using it as an analytical category. The present attempt at systematically bundling up the sociological-theoretical gender knowledge is overdue and makes sense. Furthermore, its consistent narrowing argumentation stimulates further critical-reflexive thinking. However, considering that the main target audience is students, several linguistic inaccuracies as well as the occasionally negligent use of the secondary literature must be criticized.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Heike Kahlert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain the copyright of their texts. There is no exclusive copyright transfer to querelles-net.
From 2009 on, articles at querelles-net have been published under the terms of a CC BY license:
from 2009-2015 the license Creative Commons Attribution 3.0; from 2016 the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. These licenses allow users to freely use the texts published here, if the author and place of first publication are given. The uses covered by this license do not require separate consent on the part of the authors.
For texts published before 2009, usually no Creative Commons license was given. These texts are freely available, but further uses need to be permitted by the authors.We encourage our authors to publish their texts in other places as well, e.g. repositories.